No to pain-inducing restraint

In July 2017, Article 39 successfully crowdfunded to legally challenge the use of pain and unjustified restraint during children’s frightening journeys to and from secure children’s homes. Children can be detained in these locked children’s homes from the age of 10.

  • Escort custody officers employed by GEOAmey are allowed to use force to make children follow orders.
  • Incredible as it sounds, they have been authorised and trained to deliberately inflict pain on children as a form of restraint.

These arrangements are in striking contrast to the rules that must be followed within secure children’s homes, where staff are banned from deliberately inflicting pain on children and can only use force to prevent injury, serious damage to property or a child running away.

The Department for Education is in charge of restraint rules within secure children’s homes, whereas the Ministry of Justice governs policy in respect of children’s journeys to and from custodial institutions, and within child prisons.  

Our legal challenge led first to a review of the Ministry of Justice’s escort restraint policy, and then the Government deciding to commission a wider review of the authorisation of pain-inducing restraint in all child prisons and during the escorting process.

The review is being conducted by Charlie Taylor, Chair of the Youth Justice Board (though not in that capacity). Ministers have reported he has finished his evidence-gathering.

Our judicial review application was stayed by the High Court pending the outcome of both Charlie Taylor’s review and an inquiry by parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights.

However, at the end of February 2019, the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse concluded that pain-inducing restraint is a form of child abuse which must be legally prohibited. Article 39 urged the Ministry of Justice to implement this recommendation as a matter of urgency, instead of waiting for Charlie Taylor’s report.

In April 2019, the Joint Committee on Human Rights published the report from its inquiry into solitary confinement and restraint in youth detention. The Committee repeated its opposition to pain-inducing restraint within the children’s secure estate (prisons and the escorting process).

Our submission to the Charlie Taylor Review on pain-inducing restraint (7 May 2019) can be downloaded here.

Adam Rickwood photograph

The devastating effects of pain-inducing restraint on children came to the public’s attention in 2004, when 14 year-old Adam Rickwood hanged himself in a child prison run by Serco. Adam had been unlawfully restrained and inflicted with the ‘nose distraction’ technique, which caused his nose to bleed for around an hour. Officers ignored his pleas to be taken to hospital. Before taking his own life, Adam wrote a note for his solicitor explaining that he had asked officers what gave them the right to hit a child in the nose. The technique was later withdrawn though officers continue to be trained and authorised to use other methods which cause children to suffer psychologically and physically.

8 August 2019: Article 39’s Director wrote this piece for openDemocracy on the 15th anniversary of Adam’s death.

Steps towards the prohibition of pain-inducing restraint, 2004-2019

The Ministry of Justice’s terms of reference for Charlie Taylor’s review can be found in this letter from Justice Minister Edward Argar to the Chair of the Justice Committee in Parliament.

%d bloggers like this: