Article 39 statement on Renewing Fostering plan

Teenager on bed

Article 39 welcomes the government’s Renewing Fostering plan, published 4th February 2026. We are pleased to see commitments to tackling profiteering, encouraging people from more diverse backgrounds to consider fostering, and strengthening training and support for foster carers after approval.

Safeguarding concerns

At the same time, parts of the reform raise serious questions, particularly proposals to streamline regulatory processes and to remove fostering panels. It is vital that multi-disciplinary scrutiny takes place and that children’s holistic needs are considered through professional expertise and lived experience. Without collective decision-making, excessive power rests with any one individual. We are also concerned about plans that introduce further deregulation, which risks weakening essential safeguards for children.

Institutional Perspective

It is right that the reforms acknowledge the need to ensure appropriate foster placements are available for children when a family environment is best for them. However, it must also be acknowledged that for some, family-based care may not always be. Framing children’s homes as lesser risks overlooking the lived reality of children who have already experienced instability, rejection and unmet need. It also entrenches a hierarchy of care that carries stigma, implying that residential settings are for children who have ‘failed’ within the foster care system. Reforming fostering and investing in children’s homes are not competing priorities; both require investment. Our concern based on the language and emphasis in these reforms is that children’s homes will once again be deprioritised, and with them, the children and young people who could thrive if rights-based advocacy support were provided as standard.

Deregulation

Finally, efforts to reduce necessary safeguards, often minimised as ‘red tape’ or ‘administrative burdens’, are an echo of previous attempts to deprive children of their rights and entitlements over many years. However, the two are not mutually exclusive. In efforts to improve the care system for all, it is vital that such hard-won rights for children, established over many decades, are not lost. We urge that an independent children’s rights impact assessment is undertaken to understand the potential consequences of any such proposals in full.