Image above: care experienced campaigners deliver a petition to 10 Downing Street, with 10,700+ signatures, demanding every child in care receives care where they live, 1 February 2022
Parliament’s Education Committee has today (10 July 2025) published its report from its inquiry into children’s social care. Adding considerable weight to Article 39’s longstanding campaign pressing for 16 and 17 year-olds in care to receive care where they live, the Committee recommends the introduction of universal care standards “ensuring that children in all settings receive care where they live” (recommendation 105).
Article 39 submitted evidence to this inquiry in January 2024 (here). We told the Committee:
By policy design, supported accommodation providers do not provide care to children. Were they to provide care, they would have to register their establishment as a children’s home and follow rigorous childcare standards which have developed over the decades, often in response to evidence of children’s needs not being met or abuse scandals.
Through changes to secondary legislation and the introduction of statutory guidance, the former government radically departed from decades of reform in the children’s care system which aimed to emulate loving family homes for children in their teenage years. A series of consultations and policy developments from 2020 deemed it safe and legitimate for ‘some’ children in care aged 16 and 17 to live in accommodation where they receive no care. In 2021, the former government prohibited the use of care-less accommodation (then known as semi-independent and independent accommodation, now termed supported accommodation) for children in care aged 15 and under.
Article 39 legally challenged the then government’s failure to give 16 and 17 year-olds in care the same protection as those aged 15 and under, though regrettably our case failed. At that time, Josh MacAlister’s review of children’s social care supported government plans and this backing was communicated to the High Court during the hearing in February 2022.
After meeting with Article 39 and others leading our #KeepCaringTo18 campaign, the review’s position changed by the time it published its final report, in May 2022, when it pressed for universal care standards. This is now what parliament’s Education Committee is calling for.
The Committee’s report follows the publication last month of the National Audit on Group-based Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (Casey Review) which criticised the ‘adultification’ of child victims, specifically pointing to the use of supported accommodation (‘semi-independent housing’) for teenagers in care:
Being in care almost fast-tracks children into adulthood – living in residential settings, or ‘semi-independent housing’ long before a child whose family is able to take care of them would do so.
In 2009, 22% of 16 and 17 year-olds in care were living in accommodation where they received no care. Through data obtained via a freedom of information request to the Department for Education in November 2024, Article 39 believes this increased to at least 40% in 2024. As we predicted when the last government persisted with these deeply regressive changes, care-less accommodation has become normalised within local authorities for children in care aged 16 and 17.
Despite Ofsted clearly communicating the unsuitability of this type of accommodation for teenagers who require care, especially when they have profound needs, we know this is happening time and time again.
In May 2025, a coroner found very serious failings in the care and protection of Nonita Grabovskyte by her corporate parent, the London Borough of Barnet, and other agencies. Known to be extremely vulnerable, in December 2023 Nonita took her own life through stepping in front of a train just two weeks after her 18th birthday. Entering care when she was 16, Nonita had a strongly expressed wish to be looked after by foster carers. This never happened. An inquest journalist elicited that the supported accommodation in which Nonita lived had not submitted a full application for registration with Ofsted until January 2024, meaning it appears both this private provider and the local authority had not complied with the law in respect of Nonita’s placement from 28 October 2023 (the date at which providers had to be registered or all their paperwork submitted to Ofsted).
How this government can protect teenagers in care, and young adults leaving care
In our evidence to the Education Committee in 2024, we recommended two actions that would ensure 16 and 17 year-olds in care receive care where they live, as well as protect young care leavers understandably not ready to live on their own (who are not in a ‘Staying Put’ arrangement with their former foster carers):
(1) That children’s homes secondary legislation is amended to make explicit provision for dedicated establishments for older children, thus ensuring that all looked after children receive care where they live.
(2) That the secondary legislation and statutory guidance for supported accommodation is reformulated so that it relates to care leavers only.
These measures do not require amendments to primary legislation, so they could be introduced by government without delay.



